St. Eustatius seeks additional funding for future-proof harbour

· - leestijd 1 minuut
Aerial view of the harbour
Aerial view of the harbour Photo: Statia Government

ORANJESTAD, St. Eustatius – St. Eustatius is seeking additional support from the Netherlands to complete the island’s harbour project, after new engineering assessments showed that the existing breakwater is in worse condition than previously assumed.

The harbour is considered essential infrastructure for the island. It is the main route for food, fuel, construction materials, emergency supplies and other goods. Without adequate protection, the island’s accessibility and emergency preparedness could be at risk.

The main concern is the breakwater, which protects access to the harbour. According to technical assessments, it is currently too fragile, too low and too short to offer sufficient protection, especially under future climate conditions. Strengthening the structure and extending it by about 100 metres has created an estimated funding gap of around €40 million.

The Island Council adopted a decision on 28 May supporting efforts by the Executive Council to secure the additional investment. On 17 June, the council also asked relevant parliamentary committees in the Netherlands to give the matter further attention.

Work on the container yard and passenger facilities has already started, while designs for the breakwater extension are being prepared. Statia is also working with Saba on the production of X-Blocs, which are used to protect coastal and harbour structures.

The issue has now also reached the Dutch House of Representatives. On 23 June, a motion was adopted calling on the Dutch Government and the Public Entity St. Eustatius to develop an integrated investment and implementation plan for a future-proof harbour, including clarity on funding and financing options.

Preventing further delay

Both the Executive Council and Island Council say timely decisions are needed to prevent further delays and to ensure the harbour remains safe and accessible in the long term.


54 times read